Courses Available Online, Virtually and Classroom
Fully Certified NEBOSH, IOSH, IEMA Accredited
7-Day Customer Service
David Bryan BSc, CMIOSH, CMAPS

A Review of CDM 2015 – One Year On

April 2016

This blog was updated in August 2022. 

*A more recent review of CDM 2015 was conducted 3 years after its launch.*

In a keynote address to the recently formed ‘CDM Forum’, which has been widely publicised in the industry, a former Chief Executive of the HSE stressed the importance of the ‘Industry Taking Responsibility’ in matters of design and management. Using his first-hand experience of the catastrophic effects of the 2011 earthquake aftershock on the city of Christchurch, Geoffrey Podger cited two main reasons why 115 people died in the Canterbury TV building. Firstly, the building was designed incorrectly, and secondly, the contractor who built it was not competent to do so. Clearly, these are significant causative factors, and although, thankfully, events such as large earthquakes are not the norm in this country, those points are exactly the sort of issues which the CDM Regulations 2015 are supposed to prevent.

Competency is Key

In stressing that enforcement alone is not the answer, Geoffrey Podger’s comments also highlight a particular aspect of all health and safety legislation in the UK, namely, the onus of proof (see HASAWA 74 S.40(1)). CDM 2015 has placed much greater emphasis on the duty of clients to make suitable health and safety arrangements for their construction projects, which include the appointment of designers and contractors with the necessary health and safety skills, knowledge and experience. What has not changed from CDM 2007 is the requirement for those designers and contractors ‘not to accept such an appointment or engagement unless they are competent’. Playing semantics with the word competence may have provoked discussion in some quarters; however, the basic duty on defendants to prove what is ‘reasonably practicable’ remains unchanged.

Is the L153 Guidance Document Suitable for all Sizes of Businesses?
Over the year, the decision by the HSE not to provide an ACoP and instead rely on their guidance document L153, together with industry driven material, has created much concern. Polarized views appear to be emerging as to the suitability of L153, dependent upon the size of business and consequent availability of resources to manage health and safety. For example, the Chairman of the Construction Clients’ Group (CCG) suggests that SMEs, smaller construction firms and sole traders are not so happy without the detailed guidance that the previous ACoP provided. Despite this, the Construction Industry Advisory Committee (CONIAC) meeting in November 2015 concluded that there is no strong support for a CDM 2015 ACoP, and that the courts regard ACP and guidance as having the same standing (2). Whether contraventions of L153 are admissible as evidence in court proceedings in the same way as ACoPs, appears to be contradictory, and will no doubt be the subject of future debate (see HASAWA 74 S.17).

What Maintenance Work is Considered Construction Work?

The question of ‘what is construction work’ in respect of maintenance has also received much attention over 

the past year. A quick visit to the HSE construction information pages reveals that their definition of ‘maintenance work’ remains the same as it was under CDM 2007. The previous CDM ACoP (now withdrawn) stated that general maintenance of fixed plant, except when done as part of other construction work, or involves substantial dismantling or alteration of fixed plant which is large enough to be a structure in its own right, is not construction work. The current guidance at L153 offers no such interpretation of maintenance work as construction work. Perhaps it’s not surprising therefore, that, given the increased regulatory focus on clients under CDM 2015, confirmation of maintenance work is being sought by many organisations' seeking to ensure that they do not fall foul of the law. In practice, whatever the type of work, health and safety risks must be identified and effectively managed. Whether this process is documented as Risk Assessment and Method Statement (RAMS) or Construction Phase Plan (CPP) appears open to further discussion.

Impact of the Changes to the Notification Requirements

The change to notification requirements continues to exercise many businesses, which could indicate a common lack of understanding of the CDM process. CDM 2015 added the condition of ‘… and more than 20 workers working simultaneously at any point in the project’ lasting longer than 30 days is notifiable. As notification is not linked to the provision of additional resources, and the requirement is for clients to notify ‘before the start of the construction phase’, notification may be viewed as an administrative duty that should not impinge on the operational nature of the project. Given that much planning and design work should already have taken place during the pre-construction phase, the estimated construction time allowed and the number of workers likely to be involved should be known to the client’s project management team well before the start of the construction phase.

Construction Industry Challenge

(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 Onus of proving limits of what is practicable etc.So, after one year, CDM 2015 appears to be slowly bedding in. CDM 2015 was introduced in part to control the risks associated with smaller construction projects. As such, the industry challenge of ‘taking responsibility’ is much more than an aspiration or ‘call to arms’. It is also a fundamental requirement of the legal system for CDM duty holders to be able to ‘prove’ their health and safety skills, knowledge and experience in the construction projects that they decide to undertake. With the perceived reluctance of smaller construction contractors to ‘get involved’, it appears that at this stage, much more needs to be done in the small business arena to explain the apparent simplicity and flexibility of CDM 2015. There are undoubted and well-documented benefits for clients, designers and contractors to be gained from managing their projects effectively. The ongoing challenge for all stakeholders is not to create unnecessary paperwork and barriers, but to make safe behaviour and project management easy so that CDM 2015 becomes an embedded part of what we do.

(2) Future of the CDM Approved Code of Practice Update. A report on the views expressed by CONIAC members

Need to Learn More about CDM 2015?

Our range of CDM courses provide in-depth explanations into the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015. Click the buttons below to view our different CDM courses.

Related Blogs

  • Free Cost-Benefit Analysis Template for Health and Safety: A Practical Guide Image
    Andrew Froude B.Eng (Hons), CMIOSH, MIIRSM, OSHCR

    Free Cost-Benefit Analysis Template for Health and Safety: A Practical Guide

    Download your free cost-benefit analysis template and read our step-by-step use guide to make positive changes in your workplace.
    15.05.25
  • Why Do Managers Need to Be Health and Safety Trained? Image
    William Gaunt

    Why Do Managers Need to Be Health and Safety Trained?

    Understand the moral, legal, and financial reasoning behind training managers in health and safety, with information on what managers should know about their role.
    15.05.25
  • What Is an Environmental Management System? | Business Guide & Benefits Image
    Steve Terry

    What Is an Environmental Management System? | Business Guide & Benefits

    Find out the core principles behind an environmental management system (EMS) and how they benefit business sustainability goals.
    14.05.25
  • Health and Safety Training Grants for IOSH Courses | A Guide for Businesses Image
    Jim Anderson CMIOSH, MIIRSM, AIEMA

    Health and Safety Training Grants for IOSH Courses | A Guide for Businesses

    Find out the grant options available for businesses to fund IOSH courses, so you can receive financial support for your employee's training.
    12.05.25
  • Who is Responsible for Health and Safety in the Workplace? Image
    Brenig Moore DipNEBOSH, CMIOSH, CEnvH

    Who is Responsible for Health and Safety in the Workplace?

    Find out the legal health and safety responsibilities of employees and employers in the workplace, with expert guidance on how to fulfil them.
    12.05.25
  • Is There Funding Available for NEBOSH Courses? Image
    Jim Anderson CMIOSH, MIIRSM, AIEMA

    Is There Funding Available for NEBOSH Courses?

    Find out all the funding options available for Astutis' NEBOSH courses, so you can get financial support towards your career progression.
    08.05.25
Section Curve
Case Studies

Real Life Stories

Find out how learners look back on their training with Astutis. Our case studies give our learners, both individual and corporate, a platform to share their Astutis experience. Discover how training with Astutis has helped past learners and delegates make the world a safer place, one course at a time.
More Image
Bottom Curve
What People Say

Hear What Our Learners Have To Say

We're always there for our customers. 98% of our learners rated their overall experience as good or outstanding. We will always pride ourselves on our customer service. But don’t take our word for it, here is what our customers have to say
  • "The course its self was very well presented and included valuable information. the tutor was very knowledgeable and was able to provide us with real life examples to help understand further. My only downside was the lack or exam practice within the course, the tutor allowed for students to practice exam questions and submit to him for feedback and opened the class half an hour earlier for people to attend to discuss the results. However, this topic was not covered as part of the cause so if you could not attend earlier or have time to submit after you have no feedback on completing the exam questions and no prep for how you should be responding."

    Samantha
    12.05.2025
  • "The course content was very valuable."

    Samantha
    12.05.2025
  • "It was my first time and great learning experience with ASTUTIS"

    22.04.2025
  • "It was great learning experience in sustainability"

    22.04.2025
  • "Very helpful no complaints bit long in the email process but they always got back to me eventually and had the information I needed when requested"

    Antony
    22.04.2025
  • "The course was informative I did need to buy the nebosh course book also as online account eventually got closed and I had to save all documents that were available but overall did well"

    Antony
    22.04.2025
  • "Clear and concise. A lot of information delivered in an easy to digest format. Trainer was engaging and positive, as well as easy to talk to and ask questions. Tech was good and all the materials provided/used were/are helpful."

    Kerrina
    09.04.2025
  • "Clear and concise. A lot of information delivered in an easy to digest format. Trainer was engaging and positive, as well as easy to talk to and ask questions. Tech was good and all the materials provided/used were/are helpful."

    Kerrina
    09.04.2025
  • "excellent trainer easy to follow and good mixture of team discussions."

    Keith
    03.04.2025
  • "covered a lot of my day to day tasks, easy to follow on the second week, found the first week it difficult to see what was required and understand."

    Keith
    03.04.2025