Can't Measure It? Can't Prevent It | Why 60% of Manufacturers Fly Blind on Safety KPIs
Throughout my time in the health and safety industry, from enforcement to management to education, I've witnessed countless technological transformations. Yet the latest research on maintenance digitalisation reveals a paradox that's all too familiar: while 92% of European manufacturers recognise the value of predictive and connected maintenance, two-thirds remain stuck in the early stages of digital adoption.
This is a technological gap that could have serious implications for safety and operations and demands our attention.
A Reality Check for Manufacturing
European manufacturers face a stark disconnect between digital maintenance ambitions and actual implementation. Despite confidence in the technology, practical adoption remains surprisingly low across the sector.
New research surveying 407 maintenance leaders across the UK and continental Europe reveals the current digital landscape:
Key Statistics at a Glance
- 92% recognise value of predictive/connected maintenance.
- 63% are only in early stages of their digitalisation journey..
- 59% still depend on Excel/Google Sheets for execution
- 41% continue using paper-based checklists.
- Only 6% use CMMS tools for execution.
Let me put this in perspective from my experience working with manufacturers across various sectors. The gap between aspiration and implementation represents millions in unrealised efficiency gains and, more critically, preventable safety incidents.
Understanding the Integration Challenge
Integration complexities and cultural barriers are blocking CMMS adoption more than cost concerns. Organisations struggle to blend new systems with established workflows and overcome team resistance.
The research identifies clear barriers to digital transformation:
Primary Adoption Barriers
Barrier Type | Percentage | Impact on Safety |
System Integration | 43% | Creates data silos, delays hazard identification |
Cultural Resistance | 38% | Reduces compliance, increases human error |
Limited IT Resources | ~33% | Slows emergency response capabilities |
Digital Skills Gap | ~33% | Compromises system effectiveness |
Consider this revealing statistic. Only 28% of respondents describe their maintenance processes as fully planned and preventive. The majority operate in a hybrid state, combining reactive and planned approaches, often inconsistently. This operational uncertainty creates risk multiplication. When maintenance teams can't predict equipment failures, they can't adequately protect workers from unexpected hazards.
The AI Opportunity | Strategic Applications
Manufacturing firms are using AI for quick wins but missing its transformative potential for predictive maintenance. Current applications focus on automation rather than prevention and prediction.
Current AI Usage in Maintenance
- Workflow automation - 43% of companies
- Knowledge management/chatbots - 40% of companies
- Anomaly detection - 34% of companies
- Predictive analytics - Limited adoption
From a health and safety perspective, predictive maintenance powered by AI isn't just about efficiency—it's about preventing catastrophic failures that endanger workers. Every unplanned equipment breakdown increases the risk of accidents, particularly when maintenance teams must perform emergency repairs under pressure.
The ROI Disconnect
While 92% believe in digital ROI, most lack the metrics to prove it. Without KPI dashboards and integrated reporting, organisations can't justify continued investment.
ROI Measurement Tools - Current Adoption:
- KPI Dashboards: 40%
- ERP/Production Integration: 34.5%
- Digital SOPs: 34.3%
In my work with manufacturing clients, I've found that safety metrics often provide the most compelling ROI evidence. Reduced incident rates, decreased emergency maintenance exposure hours, and improved compliance scores translate directly to bottom-line benefits through lower insurance premiums, reduced downtime, and avoided regulatory penalties.
Building Your Digital Maintenance Roadmap
Success requires a structured approach balancing technology, culture, and safety priorities. Start small with critical assets and scale based on proven results.
Based on both this research and my extensive field experience, here's my proven five-step framework:
Step-by-Step Implementation Guide
Step 1: Prioritise Safety-Critical Assets
- Identify equipment with the highest failure risk.
- Document current failure rates and safety incidents.
- Calculate potential impact of predictive maintenance.
Step 2: Establish Baseline Metrics
- Record current maintenance costs.
- Document breakdown frequencies.
- Track safety incident rates.
- Measure average response times.
Step 3: Select Integrated Solutions
- Audit existing technology stack.
- Identify integration requirements.
- Choose CMMS with open API architecture.
- Ensure mobile accessibility for field teams.
Step 4: Build Cultural Buy-In
- Form cross-functional steering committee.
- Include frontline workers in selection process.
- Create champion network across shifts.
- Develop peer-to-peer training programmes.
Step 5: Invest in Continuous Skills Development
- Assess current digital competencies
- Design role-specific training paths
- Blend technical and safety education
- Establish ongoing support systems
The Competitive Imperative
Early adopters are setting new industry standards that will become tomorrow's compliance requirements. The window for competitive advantage through digitalisation is narrowing rapidly.
Manufacturing organisations that successfully digitalise their maintenance operations gain multiple advantages:
Additional Benefits
- Enhanced Safety Culture - Proactive hazard prevention
- Talent Attraction - Modern workplace appeals to younger workers
- Regulatory Readiness - Automated compliance reporting
- Environmental Performance - Reduced waste and energy consumption
- Supply Chain Resilience - Predictable operations and delivery
With 63% of companies still in early-stage digitalisation, those who have progressed further are already reaping these benefits, creating a widening competitive gap.
Looking Ahead
The convergence of mature technology, proven ROI models, and regulatory pressure makes the next 18 months critical for maintenance digitalisation. Delayed action risks both competitive position and compliance status.
Those who delay risk finding themselves not just operationally disadvantaged but potentially unable to meet evolving safety compliance requirements. The question isn't whether to digitalise maintenance operations, but how quickly and effectively you can execute the transformation.
Remember, every day of delay represents continued exposure to preventable risks, missed efficiency opportunities, and widening competitive gaps. The research clearly shows that the intent exists; now it's time to convert that recognition into action.
Ready to stay ahead of the curve in health and safety innovation? Subscribe to the Astutis Quarterly Newsletter for expert insights and industry analysis, or browse more This Week in Health and Safety topics below to keep your organisation at the forefront of workplace safety excellence.
This Week in Health and Safety @Model.Properties.HeaderType>
Real Life Stories
